Legal Opinion

Yoder v. Briggs

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 22, 1813PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION of the Court, by

Judge Logan.

Briggs declared against Yoder in assumpsit for money laid out a°d expended for his use and benefit at the instance and request of said defendant. Upon the plea of non assumpsit, the plaintiff offered in evidence a record dewing ^judgment had been rendered against one Ambrose and Yoder, and that Briggs having entered as security for Ambrose in a replevin bond, had been the, . , several motions were made to the court upon the trial of the cause; or.e to exclude the evidence offered, as neither proving an express nor an implied assump-sit on the part of Yoder…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garth v. McCampbellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1846
  2. Clark v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1827

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API