Legal Opinion · Dissent

Severin v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 3, 1943No. 43421Published

1DissentWhaley, Chief Justice

I cannot agree with the majority opinion.

There is no legal or equitable assignment involved. This is an action by a contractor to recover damages suffered by himself and his subcontractor, occasioned by the delay of the defendant. It is admitted that defendant’s delay caused damages to both the contractor and the subcontractor. The plaintiff failed to prove the amount of his own damages but the damages suffered by the subcontractor were established by clear proof. The majority opinion admits that the subcontractor was damaged in the amount of $737.10 by allowing overhead on this amount to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Consolidated Engineering Co. ex rel. Fulton National Bank of Atlanta v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  2. Stout v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API