Legal Opinion

Prosser v. Carroll

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1900PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Demuebeb by plaintiff to counterclaim set forth in defendant’s answer.

1Opinion of the CourtHiscock, J.

This action is brought to recover damages for an alleged assault by defendant upon plaintiff. Defendant, by his *429answer, amongst other things, alleges that, upon the occasion complained of by plaintiff, the latter conducted himself improperly; that the defendant undertook to maintain and defend his rights, and that plaintiff assaulted him, and that the occurrences leading up to and resulting in such assault are the same ones complained of by plaintiff in his complaint; and said defendant demands an affirmative judgment for his damages.

Plaintiff insists that defendant cannot set up and allege…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. . Manhattan Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
  2. Heigel v. WillisNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Van AukenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Sheehan v. PierceNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Schnaderbeck v. WorthNew York Supreme Court · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Skluzacek v. WilbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1935
  2. Udovichky v. BacheffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API