Legal Opinion
Apton v. Barclays Bank, Ltd.
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 1948PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtFroessel, J.
The defendant, in an action to recover the sum of $28,564.68, with interest from April 2, 1938, moves, pursuant to rule 107 of the Buies of Civil Practice, for judgment dismissing the complaint, and each and every cause of action therein alleged, on the ground that said causes did not accrue within the time limited by law for the commencement of an action thereon.
It is undisputed that the plaintiff, in 1935, was an Austrian citizen of the Jewish faith resident in Vienna, at which time he opened a cash account in English currency with the defendant, a British banking corporation, in London,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hibernia National Bank v. . LacombeNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Wester v. . Casein Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Tillman v. Guaranty Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Drewry v. OnassisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- H. P. Drewry, S. A. R. L. v. OnassisNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Apton v. Barclays Bank, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948