Legal Opinion

Blake v. Rupe

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1982No. 5576, 5577Published

1Opinion of the Court

651 P.2d 1096 (1982)

Ruth BLAKE and Louis Dekmar, Appellants (Defendants),

v.

Thomas N. RUPE, Appellee (Plaintiff).

Thomas N. RUPE, Appellant (Plaintiff),

v.

Ruth BLAKE and Louis Dekmar, Appellees (Defendants).

Nos. 5576, 5577.

Supreme Court of Wyoming.

September 14, 1982.

Rehearing Denied October 5, 1982.

Glenn Parker (argued) and Harold F. Buck, Hirst & Applegate, Cheyenne, signed the brief on behalf of appellant Blake.

James E. Fitzgerald, Cheyenne, and F. Michael Ludwig, Wood, Ris & Hames, P.C., Denver, Colo., signed the brief on behalf of appellant Dekmar; Hames appeared in oral argument.

Raymond B.…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part; Dissent.

2Cases cited112 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

107 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API