Legal Opinion

Glidden v. Rines

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 9, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhilbrook, J.

This is an action of assumpsit in which the plaintiffs, as receivers, seek to recover from the defendant the sum of four hundred eighty-seven dollars and seventy-four cents -($487.74) upon the common count for money had and received, with a specification of claim “that the defendant was indebted to said Lincoln County Trust Company in the sum of $800.00 upon his promissory note for said amount, dated October 29, 1915, payable in one year from the date thereof, with interest at the rate of six per cent, per annum, which note was then secured by a mortgage of certain real estate, given by the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Union Bank of Chicago v. Kansas City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Boyd v. BlankmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Vroom v. Van HorneNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
  4. Lucas v. TuckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. American Surety Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
  2. Perkins v. WarrenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API