Bruno v. State

QUINN, Justice.

Rogelio Antonio Bruno, appellant, appeals from a judgment convicting him of resisting arrest. He asserts two points of error, both of which involve the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his conviction. In particular, he questions the legal and factual sufficiency of the evidence illustrating that his use of force occurred while the police effected an arrest. We affirm the judgment.

Standard of Review

As previously mentioned, appellant was charged with resisting arrest. To secure a valid conviction, the State had to prove that appellant intentionally prevented or obstructed…