Legal Opinion

Coplan v. Eastwood

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Codington County. Hon. Carl G. Sherwood, Judge. Action by John Coplan against Lydi-a E. Eastwood, and others. Fr-om an order sustaining a demurrer -to the complaint, plaintiff appeals. Right to appeal from the ruling on the -demurrer not waived by appellant. The election to amend occurs when the am-ended pleading is filed. O' Hallo ram- v. Marshall, 35 N. E. 926. Until the amended -pleading has been filed, there -is clearly no waiver. Id.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Circuit Court, Codington County. Hon. Carl G. Sherwood, Judge. Action by John Coplan against Lydi-a E. Eastwood, and others. Fr-om an order sustaining a demurrer -to the complaint, plaintiff appeals. Right to appeal from the ruling on the -demurrer not waived by appellant. The election to amend occurs when the am-ended pleading is filed. O' Hallo ram- v. Marshall, 35 N. E. 926. Until the amended -pleading has been filed, there -is clearly no waiver. Id. Respondent attempts to draw an extremely attenuated distinc■tween taking leave to amend and granting leave to amend. Other things…

1Opinion of the Court

\VHITIN;G, J.

This, is- an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to plaintiff’s comp-lai-nt. Such order, as -originally made and entered, after sustaining the demurrer, further -read: “Ordered : that the defendants have judgment hereon dismissing this action, with costs.” Plaintiff then moved the 'court for an order striking 'from such order the words quoted, and inserting “a -provision that plaintiff be granted leave to amend his complaint within such -reasonable' time as the count may- fix.” The- court -granted plaintiff’s -motion and made and entered an 'order modifying its former…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Berry and Berry v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  2. West v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Hurd v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1880
  4. Morrill v. CasperSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1903
  5. Doyle v. City of SycamoreIllinois Supreme Court · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moshannon Nat. Bank v. Iron Mountain Ranch Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Independent School Dist. of Aberdeen v. First National Bank of AberdeenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Vining v. KovarikSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API