United States v. Modes, Inc.
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion and Order
Newman, Senior Judge:
Pursuant to Rule 68 of this court, defendants seek attorneys’ fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(A) and 2412(b)(1988) (the “EAJA”). The court finds that the motion is without support in law because the prerequisites of the EAJA are not satisfied. Defendants’ motion is accordingly denied.
Background
The instant motion represents, hopefully, the final phase of a protracted litigation involving several courts and considerable pre-trial motion practice. Familiarity with the earlier proceedings is presumed, although…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States of America and Robert W. Wallace v. Claude R. Wilson, Jr., and Modes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
- F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.