Legal Opinion

United States v. Modes, Inc.

United States Court of International Trade

Decided March 4, 1994No. Court No. 89-04-00206Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion and Order

Newman, Senior Judge:

Pursuant to Rule 68 of this court, defendants seek attorneys’ fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(A) and 2412(b)(1988) (the “EAJA”). The court finds that the motion is without support in law because the prerequisites of the EAJA are not satisfied. Defendants’ motion is accordingly denied.

Background

The instant motion represents, hopefully, the final phase of a protracted litigation involving several courts and considerable pre-trial motion practice. Familiarity with the earlier proceedings is presumed, although…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States of America and Robert W. Wallace v. Claude R. Wilson, Jr., and Modes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  4. F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Larry Nadeau v. Raymond A. Helgemoe, Warden, New Hampshire State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API