Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Charles Manley v. Michael Rowley

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 30, 2017No. 15-15320Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partO’SCANNLAlN, Circuit Judge

While I concur in the decision on the merits, I respectfully dissent from Part III, “Reassignment upon Remand.” The district court’s argument that past trial outcomes verify his ability to predict what a reasonable jury can find is certainly “highly unusual.” It is also logically incoherent. Whether a specific jury finds for one party does not indicate that every reasonable jury would so find. Nevertheless, I disagree that the trial court’s inappropriate comment “call[s] for the extraordinary measure of reassignment.” McSherry v. City of Long Beach, 423 F.3d 1015, 1023 (9th Cir. 2005).

‘We…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McSherry v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Carole Krechman v. County of RiversideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  3. United States v. Wesley Jacobs and Santokh Singh TakharCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API