Johnson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
We affirm this appeal from the trial court’s denial of appellant’s motion for relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Proce*170dure 3.850, as the motion did not contain an adequate oath. Scott v. State, 464 So.2d 1171 (Fla.1985). This is without prejudice to appellant’s filing a new 3.850 motion with a proper oath.
Should such motion be filed, we would invite the trial court’s consideration of State v. Johnson, 616 So.2d 1 (Fla.1993), as further discussed in Donahue v. State, 616 So.2d 65 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993).
HERSEY and POLEN, JJ., concur. FARMER, J., concurs in result only.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Donahue v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993