Legal Opinion

State v. Dorland

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On demurrer to an information in the nature of quo •warranto.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lippincott, J.

This case is on demurrer to an information in the nature of quo warranto. The question is whether the respondent is an intruder into the office of treasurer of the township of Kearney, in the county of Hudson.

This township was originally created and organized under the general laws of this state relating to townships.

The township of Kearney is now governed by a special charter. The act is entitled “An act for the improvement of the township of Kearney, in the county of Hudson, and to 'increase the powers of the township committee in said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Application to Confirm an Assessment for the Construction of a Sewer in the PassaicSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
  2. State v. City of OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Axberg v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Canfield v. DaviesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1897
  3. Grey v. Member-at-large of UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
  4. Sneath v. MagerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API