Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Eason v. Middleton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 24, 1981No. 79-815Published

1Concurrence

I concur in the result because summary judgment was proper on the ground that the only theories presented in the complaint are each barred on a claim in tort. The amendment, which purported to add a count for breach of contract, averred merely that Defendant agreed to provide Plaintiff with reasonable and proper care and treatment. The breach of an implied agreement to provide due and reasonable care is a tort claim only and will not support an action sounding in contract; and this for the reason that the "reasonable care" allegation sets forth the precise standard imposed by law, the breach…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garig v. East End Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1966
  2. Holcomb Ex Rel. Holcomb v. Escambia County Hospital BoardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  3. Hall v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API