Legal Opinion

Berry v. SIAC

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1964PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

238 Or. 39 (1964)

393 P.2d 184

BERRY

v.

STATE INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT COMMISSION

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued May 4, 1964.

Affirmed June 17, 1964.

Harold W. Adams, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Robert Y. Thornton, Attorney General and Ray H. Lafky, Assistant Attorney General, Salem.

James B. Minturn, Prineville, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were James F. Bodie, Bodie & Minturn and Rodney R. Glantz, Prineville.

Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and DENECKE, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

SLOAN…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Butts v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Beery v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Didier v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Kistner v. BLT Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API