Legal Opinion

Dill v. Bowen

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Erom the Rush Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, C. J.

Complaint by the appellant against the appellees, as follows:

“ Mary Bill, plaintiff, complains of Alcestus Bowen and Isaac G. Bowen, her husband, defendants, and says that on the 1st day of November, 1871, plaintiff, the defendant Alcestus Bowen, (she being then the wife of Isaac G. Bowen,) Benjamin E. Dill and Solomon Dill were the owners in fee simple of the following real estate in Rush county, Indiana, to-wit:” (here, the land is described,) “ containing in all eighty acres, more or less, the interest of said Mary Dill therein being thirty-seven acres, which had, before the date…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Carpenter v. CarpenterIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Eureka Co. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  2. Buchanan v. HubbardIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Lake v. PerryMississippi Supreme Court · 1909
  4. House v. AlexanderIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Chicago & Indiana Coal Railway Co. v. HallIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API