Legal Opinion

In Re Ex Parte James

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 6, 2009No. 1051693PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Joe Nathan James, Jr., petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision affirming the circuit court’s denial of his Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition. See James v. State, 61 So.3d 332 (Ala.Crim.App.2006). We granted the writ of certiorari. For the following reasons, we reverse the Court of Criminal Appeals’ judgment and remand the case.

Facts and Procedural History

In June 1999, James was convicted of murder made capital because it was committed during a burglary. The Court of Criminal Appeals incorporated into its opinion the following facts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Ex Parte IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Ex Parte ClemonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  4. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
  5. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  2. Ex Parte Hodges, 1100112 (Ala. 8-26-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  3. Beckworth v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  4. James v. MarshallDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2022
  5. James v. MarshallDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2022

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API