In Re Ex Parte James
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Per curiam
Joe Nathan James, Jr., petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari to review the Court of Criminal Appeals’ decision affirming the circuit court’s denial of his Rule 32, Ala. R.Crim. P., petition. See James v. State, 61 So.3d 332 (Ala.Crim.App.2006). We granted the writ of certiorari. For the following reasons, we reverse the Court of Criminal Appeals’ judgment and remand the case.
Facts and Procedural History
In June 1999, James was convicted of murder made capital because it was committed during a burglary. The Court of Criminal Appeals incorporated into its opinion the following facts…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ex Parte WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Ex Parte IngramSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Ex Parte ClemonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2000
- James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2006
3Cited by9 opinions
- James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
- Ex Parte Hodges, 1100112 (Ala. 8-26-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
- Beckworth v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
- James v. MarshallDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2022
- James v. MarshallDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.