Legal Opinion

Freedman v. Clinton Court Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 23, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Rickman v. Stanley Mark Strand Carp. (241 App. Div. 633; affd., 266 N. Y. 494). All concur, except Crosby and Lewis, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and dismissal of the complaint. (The judgment affirms a judgment of the Rochester City Court in favor of plaintiff in an action for damages for personal injuries sustained by reason of falling on a stairway.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richman v. Stanley Mark Strand CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Richman v. Stanley Mark Strand Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gramm v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  2. Spaulding v. ChristakosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945