Higgins v. Knickmeyer-Fleer Realty & Investment Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
* NOTE: Opinion filed at May Term, 1934; July 17, 1934; motion for rehearing filed; motion overruled at September Term, September 18, 1934. Action for damages for alleged malicious prosecution. The Duke Realty Construction Company, a corporation, Sam Duke, Joseph Boxerman, Knickmeyer-Fleer Realty Investment Company, a corporation, and Henry Knickmeyer, A.J. Fleer and Charles Dietrich, members and officers of said corporation, were made defendants. During the trial plaintiff dismissed as to defendants Henry Knickmeyer and Charles Dietrich. A verdict was returned finding the issues for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Finke v. BoyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Randol v. Kline's IncorporatedSupreme Court of Missouri · 1929
- Randol v. Kline's, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Laughlin v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1932
3Cited by39 opinions
- Sanders v. Daniel International Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Haswell v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
- Renda v. International Union, UAWMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Hughes v. Aetna Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Zahorsky v. Griffin, Dysart, Taylor, Penner & Lay, P.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.