Legal Opinion

Biddle v. Luvisch

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 26, 1923No. 6125PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRIEBER, District Judge.

This is an appeal by the warden of the United States penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kan., from a judgment *700discharging the appellee from confinement in the penitentiary on a writ of habeas corpus.

The only question involved is the sufficiéncy of the indictment containing three counts, charging a violation of section 161 of the Penal Code (Comp. St. § 10331), to which appellee had entered a plea of guilty, and upon that plea was sentenced to imprisonment for the term of five years. The counts only differ in that the first charges making of a plate, the second possession of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Ex Parte ParksSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Cuba Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Collins v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. The Hanna NielsenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. LuvischDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1927
  2. Cronin v. EnnisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  3. Smith v. HaysCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. Egan v. KnewelDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1924
  5. United States v. One Zumstein Briefmarken Katalog 1938District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API