Legal Opinion

Burrell v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided February 10, 2004No. CIV.A. 3:03CV542BNPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BARBOUR, District Judge.

This cause is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion to Remand. Having considered the Motion, Response, Rebuttal, attachments to each, and supporting and opposing authority, the Court finds that the Motion to Remand should be granted.

I. BACKGROUND AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover for personal injuries and property damages arising out of automobile accidents. Defendants are the manufacturers and sellers of the automobiles. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants manufactured and sold them automobiles with defective ignition…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Great Plains Trust Co. v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  3. Travis v. IrbyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2003
  4. Adrian Cavallini v. State Farm Mutual Auto Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  5. Tapscott v. MS Dealer Service Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Texas Instruments Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
  2. Rogers v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API