Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Strong

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 13, 1984PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTS, Justice.

Michael J. Strong appeals from a judgment entered in Superior Court, Knox County, following a jury verdict in favor of the plaintiffs, Donald G. Wilson and Allison A. Loring. Strong contends, inter alia, that a verdict based upon promissory estop-pel is improper because that theory of recovery was not raised in the complaint. We vacate the judgment and remand to the Superior Court.

The plaintiffs own, as cotenants, the land and building in question. The plaintiffs had constructed the building allegedly for the defendant to use as a lobster storage facility. Before construction…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Stanley v. Schiavi Mobile Homes, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  2. Chapman v. BomannSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  3. E. N. Nason, Inc. v. Land-Ho Development Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  4. Barrett v. GreenallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1942
  5. Doane v. Pine State Volkswagen, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Struck v. HackettSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995
  2. Chrysler Credit Corp. v. Bert Cote's L/A Auto Sales, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  3. Clarke v. DiPietroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  4. Mercier v. GuimondSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
  5. State v. KellySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API