Legal Opinion
Barnes v. Binghamton Urban Renewal Agency
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 5, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarvey, J.
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Crew, *804III, J.), entered December 10, 1984 in Broome County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondents’ motion to dismiss the petition for want of standing and as untimely.
In 1963, the Binghamton City Council designated an area in the City of Binghamton, Broome County, as an urban renewal area pursuant to General Municipal Law §§ 502 and 504. "Parcel 5A”, included within the urban renewal area, is the subject of this proceeding. In February 1981, respondent Binghamton Urban Renewal Agency (BURA) decided…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. v. WalkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Abrams v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Tufaro Transit Co. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
3Cited by3 opinions
- 106 Mile Transport Associates v. KochDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Blue Cross of Western New York, Inc. v. CooperAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Matter of New York Taxi Workers Alliance v. New York City Taxi & Limousine CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2025