Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Cooney
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 5, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
The plaintiff replevied certain household goods and personal effects from the defendants, alleging in her complaint that they had wrongfully taken them into their possession and detained them from her. In their answer the defendants alleged that they were the proprietors of a lodging house in which the plaintiff was received as a lodger, that she was indebted to them for lodging, and that the property replevied was brought by her to their house during her stay there and was retained by them by virtue of their lien as lodging house keepers. Section 5134 of the General Statutes gives to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mathews v. LivingstonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912
- Dewar v. Minneapolis Lodge No. 44 Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jo-Mark Sand & Gravel Co. v. PantanellaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Marden v. RadfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1935
- Monarch Accounting Supplies, Inc. v. PreziosoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
- Tamamian v. GabbardDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
- Johnson v. KolibasNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.