Legal Opinion
Radford v. IPD PRINTING & DISTRIBUTING, INC.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 8, 1987No. 74465PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Beasley, Judge.
1. Defendants seek to appeal directly an order denying a motion to set aside the judgment. They have failed to follow the statutorily prescribed procedure for appealing such an order. OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (8). The appeal must be dismissed. Goodwin v. Richmond, 182 Ga. App. 745 (1) (356 SE2d 888) (1987); Folks, Inc. v. Agan, 177 Ga. App. 480 (340 SE2d 26) (1986).
2. Plaintiff filed a motion for imposition of 10 percent damages pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-6. As in Miller v. Bank of the South, 177 Ga. App. 42, 43 (2) (338 SE2d 436) (1985), we deny the motion. We are of the opinion that we…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Jesup v. BennettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1970
- Goodwin v. RichmondCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Miller v. Bank of the South, N.A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Folks, Inc. v. AganCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
3Cited by7 opinions
- Management Compensation Group/Southeast, Inc. v. United Security Employee Programs, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. YanceyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Wieland v. WielandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
- Scott v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Bowles v. LovettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.