Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hedrick v. Grant County Public Service District

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 2001No. 28472Published

1DissentMaynard, Justice

(Filed July 5, 2001)

I dissent because I find two problems with the majority’s disposition of this case. First, the majority’s decision ignores our law as stated in Syllabus Point 1 of State ex rel. C & P Telephone Co. v. Ashworth, 190 W.Va. 547, 438 S.E.2d 890 (1993). Second, and more fundamentally, the issues in this ease are now res judicata so that there is no reason to remand the case to the circuit court.

As quoted by the majority opinion, Syllabus Point 1 of State ex rel. C & P Telephone Co. v. Ashworth provides:

Although the general rule is that one must exhaust administrative remedies…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blake v. Charleston Area Medical Center, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Central West Virginia Refuse, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Vest v. Bd. of Educ. of Cty. of NicholasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. RowingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Rowan v. McKnightWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API