Legal Opinion

May v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided March 10, 1976No. Docket No. 9256-74Published

Petitioner claimed as an itemized interest deduction an amount paid to respondent for failure to pay timely her proper tax liabilities. Sec. 6651(a)(2). Held, the above amount does not represent interest and does not constitute an allowable deduction.

1Opinion of the Court

Frances J. May, Petitioner v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

May v. Commissioner

Docket No. 9256-74

United States Tax Court

65 T.C. 1114; 1976 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 147;

March 10, 1976, Filed

Decision will be entered under Rule 155.

Petitioner claimed as an itemized interest deduction an amount paid to respondent for failure to pay timely her proper tax liabilities. Sec. 6651(a)(2). Held, the above amount does not represent interest and does not constitute an allowable deduction.

S. Gordon Shreffler, for the petitioner.

Thomas J. Miller, for the respondent.

Sterrett, Judge.

STERRETT

OPINION

The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tank Truck Rentals, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. May v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1976
  3. Reuter v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API