Legal Opinion

Kinney's Election Expenses

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 19, 1909No. Appeal, No. 216PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 216, Oct. T., 1908, by George M. Cosier et al., from order of Q. S. Monroe Co., dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report In the Matter of the Nomination Account of Eugene Kinney, a candidate for office. Exceptions to report of A. R. Brittain Esq., auditor. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was order dismissing exceptions to auditor’s report.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Head, J.,

Eugene Kinney was a candidate at the spring primaries for nomination to the office of representative in the general assembly of Pennsylvania from Monroe county. In due time he filed his account of moneys expended for election expenses under the act of March 5,1906. On the application of the appellants this account was audited in the first instance by an auditor appointed by the court to which the petition was addressed. He heard a mass of testimony and filed a detailed report finding: “That the candidate’s campaign for nomination was conducted in a lawful manner and that…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Umbel's ElectionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1910

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API