Legal Opinion

Clark v. Davis

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 23, 2006No. 41,769-CAPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDrew, J.

|!Plaintiff, Berta Mae Clark, a duly qualified elector in the Town of Waterproof, filed this action objecting to the candidacy of defendant, Kemmeka Davis, for the office of Mayor of Waterproof. Clark alleged that Davis was not a duly qualified resident of Waterproof and had not been legally domiciled in Waterproof for the one-year period required by law. The trial court ruled in favor of Davis, finding that Clark failed to prove her case. For the following reasons, we affirm the trial court’s ruling.

FACTS

On August 15, 2006, Clark filed a petition objecting to Davis’ qualifications for Mayor…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Landiak v. RichmondSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  2. Davis v. EnglishLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. April King v. Shelton Berry, and Hon. Amanda Gross Thies, West Baton Rouge Parish Clerk of CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API