Legal Opinion
Schumacher v. Sea Craft Industries, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 12, 1984PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously affirmed, with costs to respondent. Memorandum: Plaintiff appeals from an order granting the motion of defendant Perdue-Dean Co., Inc., a Florida corporation, to dismiss the complaint on the ground of lack of personal jurisdiction (CPLR 3211, subd [a], par 8). The only argument warranting discussion is that the court should have granted plaintiff a continuance to develop facts, relevant to the issue of jurisdiction. Plaintiff’s complaint and affidavit in opposition to the motion to dismiss fail to show that “facts essential to justify opposition [to dismissal] may exist”…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Fantis Foods, Inc. v. Standard Importing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Peterson v. Spartan Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1974
- Amigo Foods Corp. v. Marine Midland BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by9 opinions
- International Customs Associates, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Hoheb v. Pathology Associates of AlbanyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Spectra Products, Inc. v. Indian River Citrus Specialties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- NYC Medical & Neurodiagnostic, P.C. v. Republic Western InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2004
- Transcan Sys., Inc. v. Seldat Distrib., Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.