Legal Opinion

Louis v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 18, 1930No. 8 Div. 256PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBricken, P. J.

Because of the unusual nature and character of this case, the court has deemed it advisable to read the entire record sitting en bane; and to likewise give to it the consideration of the entire court.

This appellant was indicted for the offense of robbery. He was convicted as charged and his • punishment fixed by the jury at imprisonment for ten years. In accordance with this verdict he was duly sentenced to the penitentiary.

In the case of Douglass v. State, 21 Ala. App. 289, 107 So. 791, 793, this court defined the offense here involved, and no elaboration of what was there said is necessary.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Douglass v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harding v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1968
  2. Pollard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  3. Hern v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Hern v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Raybon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API