Legal Opinion

Giardino Corp. v. Goldblatt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 3, 1952Published

1Opinion of the Court

Although the granting of the motion did not impinge upon the constitutional right to a trial by jury (Steck v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co., 142 N. Y. 236; 4 Carmody on New York Practice, p. 2692, and cases cited) the record did not warrant the granting of a compulsory order of reference on the ground that the examination of a long account was necessary within the meaning of section 466 of the Civil Practice Act, under long-settled authority. (Davidson v. Sterngass, 279 App. Div. 875, and cases cited therein; Untermyer v. Beinhauer, 105 N. Y. 521.) Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Steck v. Colorado Fuel & Iron Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Untermyer v. . BeinhauerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. Davidson v. SterngassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API