Legal Opinion

Tapley v. Futrell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 10, 1933No. 4-3176PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

The Legislature of 1933 ’ passed act 167. The title of the act is: “An Act to Refund All State Highway Obligations.” Section 1 of the act reads as follows:

“The issuance of Arkansas State Bonds, hereinafter called State Bonds, is hereby authorized in a total sum equal to the aggregate of the entire outstanding indebtedness of the State on account of the construction and maintenance of the State Highway System, including all State Highway Notes or Bonds, Toll-Bridge Bonds, Revenue Bonds, valid outstanding Road District Bonds on which the State has been paying interest under act No. 11 of the-…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dred Scott v. SandfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1857
  2. South Carolina v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Bush v. MartineauSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
  4. Cory v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Carter v. CainSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McArthur v. SmallwoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  2. Sparling v. Refunding BoardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  3. Brown v. Arkansas Centennial CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937
  4. Hubbell v. LeonardDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API