Legal Opinion

Slater v. William

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided November 3, 1977No. Civ. No. T-77-1217PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMSEN, Senior District Judge.

In his present petition for a writ of habeas corpus, Slater raises for the first time in this court his contention that he was deprived of his constitutional rights because on January 15, 1960, in the Criminal Court of Baltimore, after he had been convicted of participation in two separate armed robberies, the late Judge Prendergast considered, in imposing sentence for those offenses, pri- or convictions in five cases in which Slater had not been represented by counsel, as well as convictions in cases in which he had been represented by counsel.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. United States v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Burgett v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beane v. Mii Technologies, et al.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API