Legal Opinion

Ritchie v. City of Hamtramck

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1954No. Docket 20; Calendar 45,930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Plaintiff filed her bill of complaint against defendants herein praying for an injunction and an accounting for damages and that the court decree all health ordinances or health code and/or the building code of the city of Hamtramck, unconstitutional insofar as the same are invoked against plaintiff by said defendants.

• The court, upon motion of defendants, dismissed the hill of complaint, stating that the plaintiff “would have an adequate remedy at law and equity will not interfere with the enforcement of a city ordinance, where adequate relief may be obtained, as in this particular…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Long v. City of Highland ParkMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hitchman v. Township of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Osborn v. Charlevoix Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Redford Moving & Storage Co. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Michigan Salt Works v. BairdMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jeffrey v. Clinton TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Weinhardt v. Addison Community SchoolsMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Robert Reeves v. Wayne CountyMichigan Court of Appeals · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API