Wright v. State

Quillian, Justice.

In their bill of exceptions the defendants assign error on the judgment sentencing each defendant (fourth ground) and ont the denial of their motion for a new trial (third ground). However, in their brief to this court they completely omitted the fourth ground and merely referred to the third ground by asking: “Did the court commit error in overruling plaintiff’s in error motion for new trial?” There was no argument, citation of authority, or statement ■ that such grounds were still relied upon. Therefore, the applicable rule, as laid down in Henderson v. Lott, 163 Ga. 326…