Meadville Master Antenna, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1DissentGibbons, Circuit Judge
I agree, not without misgivings, that there is a sufficient evidentiary basis in the administrative record to support the conclusion by the Federal Communications Commission that WICU-TV, Channel 12, Erie, Pennsylvania, projects a Grade B contour over Meadville. Thus I agree that under 47 C.F.R. § 76.92 (1975), WICU is entitled to signal priority over WFMJ-TV, Channel 21, Youngstown, Ohio, on the Meadville Master Antenna, Inc. (MMA) cable system. I do not agree, however, that the Commission’s action on MMA’s waiver petition can be approved.
When WICU requested signal priority, MMA petitioned…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Titusville Cable TV, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
- Meadville Master Antenna, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission and United States of Ameria, Lamb Communications, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971