Legal Opinion

Robinson v. . Threadgill

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1851PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Law of Montgomery County, at the Fall Term, 1851, his Honor Judge Bailes1 presiding. The case is stated in the opinion of the Co.urt. Winston and Mendenhall, for the defendant, cited the following authorities, 2 Kent’s Oom. 508, Thorne v Dees, 4 John. R. 84 and 2 Chit. Plead. 154th page.

1Opinion of the CourtNash, J.

This was an action on the ease.

The plaintiif put into the hands of the defendant two notes on John II. M ask, of Anson county, which the defendant promised to collect or return. The defendant gave the plaintiff a receipt in words and figures, as follows, to wit: Wadesboro’, Sept. 17th, 1845, Received of A. Robinson the following notes to collect or return, as an officer, against John H. Masjfc for fifteen dollars, with interest from 13th. day of January, 1843, with a credit of two dollars paid the 15th of Sept. 1842: also one against John LI. Mask, for $13 65, with interest from 1st of…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Solomon v. . BatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Fisher v. Greensboro Water Supply Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  3. J. M. Pace Mule Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Sprinkle v. . BrimmSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. J. M. Pace Mule Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API