Legal Opinion
Clarence Hudgins v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 20, 1965No. 14818_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BIGGS, Chief Judge.
Hudgins was indicted for the crime of robbing a bank. See 18 U.S.C. § 2113 (b) and (f). He was represented by an experienced counsel of his own selection, Donald Goldberg, Esquire, of the Bar of Pennsylvania. Prior to the impanel-ling of a jury, Hudgins’ counsel moved to suppress certain physical exhibits and statements made by Hudgins to federal agents. After a hearing, this motion was denied. Hudgins’ counsel then informed the court that Hudgins wished to change his plea of not guilty to guilty. The trial judge made a fair and lucid explanation to Hudgins of his rights…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- MacHibroda v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. JeffersSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Kercheval v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Walker v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth ex rel. Kerekes v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Commonwealth v. GarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
- Robert Woodward, A/K/A Robert Woodard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Charles H. Ptomey and Edward L. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966
- People v. NaranjoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.