Sweeney v. Vaughn
Tennessee Supreme Court
EROM WILLIAMSON. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Williamson County. W. L. Grigsby, J.
1Opinion of the Court
SNODGRASS, Ch. J.
Vaughn was the purchaser of a horse at a public sale made by Sweeney in pursuance to an advertisement of sale of this and other personal property. The terms of the sale, as set forth in the advertisement, were: ££A11 sums under ten dollars, cash; over this amount, a credit of twelve months avüI be given. Notes, with two approved securities, bearing interest from date,” required of purchasers.
The sale was made on January 6, 1894. The horse in controversy was bought by Vaughn at the price of seventy-twó dollars, an amount which required the giving of a note. Vaughn was not then…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Lawson v. WarrenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- W. C. Early Co. v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- Hamilton v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Collier v. Slayden Bros. Ltd. Partnership of WaverlyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
- Better Built Homes & Mortgage Co. v. NolteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.