Legal Opinion
FAIRCHILD v. SWEARINGEN
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 31, 2013No. 110274PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN F. FISCHER, Presiding Judge.
T1 Dennis M, Fairchild filed this small claims action against his roofing contractor Swearingen Remodeling, Inc., who admittedly installed shingles of a lesser value than required by the parties' contract, After the case was tried to the district court, Judgment was entered in Fairchild's favor. The Judgment provided alternative forms of relief and permitted Swearingen to choose which form of relief to provide: < (1) replace the nonconforming shingles with the shingles specified in the contract, (2) return Fairchild's partial payment. Swearingen elected the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Christian v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Ogden Martin Systems of Indianapolis, Inc. v. Whiting Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1999
- BMC Industries, Inc. v. Barth Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- AKA Distributing Company v. Whirlpool CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Moore v. VanderlooSupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- FAIRCHILD v. SWEARINGENCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
- Lockard Aircraft Sales Co., Inc. v. Dumont Aircraft Sales, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023