Legal Opinion
James Andrew Thomas v. Dick Cheney, Secretary of Defense, and Michael P.W. Stone, Secretary of the Army
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 12, 1991No. 90-1135Published
1Opinion of the Court
925 F.2d 1407
James Andrew THOMAS, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Dick CHENEY, Secretary of Defense, and Michael P.W. Stone,
Secretary of the Army, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 90-1135.
United States Court of Appeals,
Federal Circuit.
Feb. 12, 1991.
James A. Thomas, Guidepost, Inc., Phoenix, Ariz., argued, pro se.
E. Roy Hawkens, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued, for defendants-appellants. With him on the brief were Stuart M. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tony M. Graham, U.S. Atty. and Anthony J. Steinmeyer. Also on the brief were Lt. Col. Mark A. Steinbeck, and Maj. Robert C. McFetridge, Office of the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Burlington Truck Lines, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.