Legal Opinion

Miller v. Canton Motor Coach, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1937PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, P. J.

Adam J. Miller was the owner of 203 shares of the capital stock of Canton Motor Coach, Inc., the total outstanding issue of stock being 2730% shares. The directors of the company, having agreed upon a sale of all its assets, called a meeting of the stockholders to approve their action. At the meeting so called the holders of all the capital stock appeared, either in person or by proxy, and all the shares were voted in approval of the action of the directors, excepting only the stock of Miller, aforesaid. He then proceeded under the provisions of Section 8623-72, General Code. No question is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Matter of FultonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Pfleger v. RennerOhio Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Manning v. Brandon CorporationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. Williams v. National Pump Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Adams v. United States Distributing Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1945
  2. Wildermuth v. Lorain Coal & Dock Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1941
  3. U.S. Inspect, Inc. v. McGreevyVirginia Circuit Court · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API