Legal Opinion
Parker v. Tenneco Inc
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided December 6, 2024No. 5:23-cv-10816Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Tanika Parker, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 23-cv-10816 v. Judith E. Levy United States District Judge Tenneco Inc., et al., Mag. Judge Kimberly G. Altman Defendants. ________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY PENDING ORDER ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI [30] AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STAY DISCOVERY PENDING A RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFFS’ AMENDED COMPLAINT [42] Before the Court are Defendants’ Motion to Stay Pending Order on Petition for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Maryland v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Judy Gettings v. Building Laborers Local 310 Fringe Benefits FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.