Legal Opinion
Leonard O'day, Dba Leonard O'Day Company v. George Arakelian Farms, Inc., a California Corporation, United States of America, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 27, 1976No. 73-1361PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge:
Appellant challenges the constitutionality of the provision of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act of 1930, 7 U.S.C. § 499g(c), requiring a double bond to effectuate an appeal to a district court from a reparations award entered by the Secretary of Agriculture. The district court upheld the requirement. We reverse.
The principal purpose of the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act is “to provide a practical remedy to small farmers and growers who were vulnerable to the sharp practices of financially irresponsible and unscrupulous brokers in perishable…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Weinberger v. SalfiSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Hiller Cranberry Products, Inc. v. KoplovskyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Myron v. ChicoineCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Adsani v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Paul W. Kessenich v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Rosenthal & Company v. Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Paul W. Kessenich, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Adsani v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.