Legal Opinion

Grindle v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 7, 1979No. 58034PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

The defendant appeals his conviction for burglary. Held:

1. The defendant contends he should have been granted a separate trial from that of his co-defendant (see Armour v. State, 151 Ga. App. 254).

Although he made a written motion to sever from another defendant who was not tried with him, no motion was made as regards the co-defendant with whom he was tried jointly. Even if a proper motion had been made, this issue is controlled adversely to defendant’s contentions by our ruling in Armour, supra.

2. During the course of the cross examination of the co-defendant he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
  2. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  4. Pope v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  5. Hixson v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carroll v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  2. Duke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  3. Larocque v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  4. Larocque v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API