Legal Opinion

Syfert v. Lenett Realty Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carswell, J.:

This is a motion for change of venue upon three grounds. Two of them, convenience of witnesses and residence of the plaintiff, need not be considered. Neither presents a meritorious question on the record herein. The other ground is that this action is required by section 184, subdivision 1, of the Civil Practice Act to be tried in New York county. The action is for treble damages for “ forcible entry or detainer.” (Real Prop. Law, § 535, as added by Laws of 1920, chap. 930.) It is claimed that such an action is one, in the language of section 184, subdivision 1, of the Civil…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Layton v. McConnellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  2. Marchand v. HaberNew York Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Leonia Amusement Corp. v. Loew's Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
  2. Banana Distributors, Inc. v. United Fruit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API