Durham v. Plum Creek Mfg.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
760 So.2d 564 (2000)
Foster J. DURHAM, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
PLUM CREEK MANUFACTURING, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 32,888-WCA.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.
May 10, 2000.
Gary D. Nunn, Jonesboro, Counsel for Appellant.
Williams & Williams by Joe Payne Williams, Shreveport, Counsel for Appellee.
Before WILLIAMS, STEWART, GASKINS, PEATROSS and KOSTELKA JJ.
GASKINS, Judge.
The defendant, Plum Creek Manufacturing, appeals a decision by the Office of Worker's Compensation, finding that the plaintiff, Foster J. Durham, is entitled to workers' compensation benefits. The plaintiff answered the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Stewart; Concurring in part, dissenting in part · Stewart.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- Sharbono v. Steve Lang & Son LoggersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Quinones v. US Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Harris v. Coushatta Indus. Sand, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Mitchell v. Brown Builders, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Buxton v. Sunland Const.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Nolan v. Rawls Farming Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Daniel v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
- Dales v. Ceco Concrete Const.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.