Legal Opinion

Morrison v. Terrell

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from Graham District Court. Action brought by Terrell against Morrison and wife, upon a promissory note and a bond for a deed, and to foreclose a vendor’s lien. Trial at the October Term, 1881, of the district court, and judgment for plaintiff and against defendants, who bring the case here. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

This was an action on a note and a bond for a deed. The petition alleges a sale of certain real estate; that a note was given for the purchase-price; that a bond was given by the vendor to convey the real estate upon the *327-payment of the note. Both the note and the bond were ■copied into the petition. An answer was filed, and the case went to trial. Judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, decreeing the amount of the note a lien .on the property; that the property be sold, and the proceeds applied in satisfaction of this amount. The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Iles v. ElledgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Close v. DunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McAlpine v. ReichenekerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  2. Dubois v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Hull v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Soper v. GabeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  5. Graves v. ChambersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API