Legal Opinion

Abbe v. Rood

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Michigan

Decided June 15, 1854PublishedCited by 3 opinions

[At law. Action by Abbe & Colt against Rood & Rood on two promissory notes. Verdict and judgment for plaintiffs.]

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT. This action is brought on two promissory notes. The signatures on both notes were erased, and they were offered in evidence without proof of their execution, as by the pleading they were not denied. But the court held that the notes could not be read without accounting for the erasures. A witness was called, who stated that the notes were sent to him as also the account, as counsel, for collection. Being unwell, he sent the notes to Mather & Taft, counsel ait Niles. At that time, the signatures to the notes were not erased. On this evidence, the notes and the account…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Woodruff v. DobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1845

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Preston v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Feild v. FarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. Levy, Simon & Co. v. BrownMississippi Supreme Court · 1878

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API