Legal Opinion

Higgins v. Breen

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1845PublishedCited by 30 opinions

ERROR to St. Louis Court of Qommon Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by the plaintiff in error, Rosalina Higgins, against the administrator of Bernard McNally’s estate.

The declaration contained two counts. The fii’st was a special one, setting out at length the facts of the case, and alledging, that B. Mc-Nally in his lifetime, representing himself to be a widower, sole and unmarried, solicited the plaintiff to marry him, and as his wife to take charge and control of his family and domestic concerns, in consideration of which she should enjoy all the rights, interests and privileges of a married woman. That the…

2Cited by30 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Cooper v. CooperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Gilkeson v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. Bates v. SylvesterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  5. State Ex Rel. Thomas v. DauesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API